<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Subite.eu &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://subite.eu/blog/category/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://subite.eu</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple goodies and predictions</title>
		<link>http://subite.eu/blog/2009/10/21/apple-goodies-and-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://subite.eu/blog/2009/10/21/apple-goodies-and-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subite.eu/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; Back in November last year I posted this: What will Apple bring in 2009 My timing was absolutely not right (way too optimistic), biut it seems I got the inclusion of the Intel i7 CPU with 4 cores in the iMac right for 2009. I nailed the iPhone hardware stuff for the 3GS, got the timing wrong for iPhone OS and Snow Leopard. For the iPod, i put &#8216;maybe a device more geared to gaming&#8217;, and it looks like the omission of the camera on the iPod Touch and the push of it as a gaming device would be just that. The Nano got an update, not what I thought , just video added. The SSD iPod will be for 2011 I think, prices need to drop drastically to make it viable, chances are that iPod Touch and iPhone will simply get more and more memory. Mac mini server update was a surprise, I thought the form factor would change more Q1 2010 will bring a new Apple TV.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Back in November last year I posted this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.subite.eu/2008/11/what-will-apple-bring-in-2009/">What will Apple bring in 2009</a></p>
<p>My timing was absolutely not right (way too optimistic), biut it seems I got the inclusion of the Intel i7 CPU with 4 cores in the iMac right for 2009.</p>
<p>I nailed the iPhone hardware stuff for the 3GS, got the timing wrong for iPhone OS and Snow Leopard.</p>
<p>For the iPod, i put &#8216;maybe a device more geared to gaming&#8217;, and it looks like the omission of the camera on the iPod Touch and the push of it as a gaming device would be just that. The Nano got an update, not what I thought , just video added. The SSD iPod will be for 2011 I think, prices need to drop drastically to make it viable, chances are that iPod Touch and iPhone will simply get more and more memory.</p>
<p>Mac mini server update was a surprise, I thought the form factor would change more <img src='http://subite.eu/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Q1 2010 will bring a new Apple TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subite.eu/blog/2009/10/21/apple-goodies-and-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash ah-aaaaaah savior of&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://subite.eu/blog/2009/02/07/flash-ah-aaaaaah-savior-of/</link>
		<comments>http://subite.eu/blog/2009/02/07/flash-ah-aaaaaah-savior-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subite.eu/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flash on the iPhone would be a blessing to Mac OS X. Flash on a Mac has always been very troublesome. It was always slower and more crash prone  than it&#8217;s Windows counterpart. I think this has to do with how Adobe builds it&#8217;s stuff for the Mac. Using less optimized code, more or less functional and whalla a Mac has Flash support. Recent releases have been better and better, but are still sub-par to Windows. My guess is that Apple was never happy about how it was implemented and now they played hard to get with the iPhone. Adobe recently acknowledged that it was a bigger challenge than they expected and are working with Apple to get it done. If that&#8217;s true or not we&#8217;ll never know until it&#8217;s released.  Now if it&#8217;s true, it means Adobe has to go through the paces and the Apple QA. I think they will learn a thing or two on how to optimize code for Cocoa and Mac OS X in general. This would mean Adobe will start to create software that runs better and better.  Adobe is a well respected developer and they have great products, but developers also hate to change habits, like they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-226" title="flash_icon" src="http://www.subite.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/flash_icon.gif" alt="flash_icon" width="200" height="200" /></p>
<p>Flash on the iPhone would be a blessing to Mac OS X.</p>
<p>Flash on a Mac has always been very troublesome. It was always slower and more crash prone  than it&#8217;s Windows counterpart. I think this has to do with how Adobe builds it&#8217;s stuff for the Mac. Using less optimized code, more or less functional and whalla a Mac has Flash support. <a href="http://www.kaourantin.net/2008/07/adobe-flash-player-10-pre-release.html">Recent releases have been better and better</a>, but are still sub-par to Windows.</p>
<p><span id="more-225"></span></p>
<p>My guess is that Apple was never happy about how it was implemented and now they played hard to get with the iPhone. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/confirmed_apple_and_adobe_coll.php">Adobe recently acknowledged that it was a bigger challenge than they expected and are working with Apple to get it done</a>. If that&#8217;s true or not we&#8217;ll never know until it&#8217;s released. </p>
<p>Now if it&#8217;s true, it means Adobe has to go through the paces and the Apple QA. I think they will learn a thing or two on how to optimize code for Cocoa and Mac OS X in general. This would mean Adobe will start to create software that runs better and better. </p>
<p>Adobe is a well respected developer and they have great products, but developers also hate to change habits, like <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/04/photoshop_lr_64.html">they skipped 64-bit support because Apple would not support it in parts of Carbon</a>, or changed stuff that they did not expect. A big company and a big team can&#8217;t move that quickly but if they are determined to meet a goal, they will get there, eventually.</p>
<p>But the iPhone might move them to learn a few new tricks faster than they usually do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subite.eu/blog/2009/02/07/flash-ah-aaaaaah-savior-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buggy Spaces</title>
		<link>http://subite.eu/blog/2008/12/11/buggy-spaces/</link>
		<comments>http://subite.eu/blog/2008/12/11/buggy-spaces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frustratie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subite.eu/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like working with multiple monitors. I have an iMac at work and to compensate the fact not having a second monitor, I tried to use spaces on and of. Spaces is so cool, it&#8217;s flashy it moves it does everything except make coffee. Now you can pin the applications to specific spaces, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to stick. It goes completely baloney when you have windows of the same app spread over different spaces. Then apple-tab makes you seasick. I want to go to the app below the current window, so I apple-tab to that app, to avoid getting my hands away from the keyboard, but since that app below also has a window in another space, Mac OS X swaps to the other space, where the windows I don&#8217;t need is&#8230; If there is a window if the app in the current space why doesn&#8217;t it stay in that space? Or why can&#8217;t that be an option?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-172" title="spaces_hero20071016" src="http://www.subite.eu/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/spaces_hero20071016.png" alt="spaces_hero20071016" width="511" height="381" />I like working with multiple monitors. I have an iMac at work and to compensate the fact not having a second monitor, I tried to use spaces on and of.</p>
<p><span id="more-171"></span>Spaces is so cool, it&#8217;s flashy it moves it does everything except make coffee. Now you can pin the applications to specific spaces, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to stick. It goes completely baloney when you have windows of the same app spread over different spaces. Then apple-tab makes you seasick. I want to go to the app below the current window, so I apple-tab to that app, to avoid getting my hands away from the keyboard, but since that app below also has a window in another space, Mac OS X swaps to the other space, where the windows I don&#8217;t need is&#8230; If there is a window if the app in the current space why doesn&#8217;t it stay in that space? Or why can&#8217;t that be an option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subite.eu/blog/2008/12/11/buggy-spaces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What will Apple bring in 2009</title>
		<link>http://subite.eu/blog/2008/11/19/what-will-apple-bring-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://subite.eu/blog/2008/11/19/what-will-apple-bring-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subite.eu/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just some assumption at what I think we could see in 2009 from Apple Inc. Announcing in Januari 2009 iMac with Intel i7 CPU, low end with 2 cores (Apple Exclusive), high end with 4 cores Snow Leopard preview Mac Mini update, possible different form factor iLife &#8217;09, basic Blu-ray support iWork &#8217;09, mostly Number and Pages updates Announcing at DAB 2009 30&#8243; LED cinema display Apple TV update Announcing at WWDC 2009 Snow Leopard, just released iPhone OS push support enabled available 3 weeks after (was announced last year) iPhone hardware update, better camera, more memory, bluetooth better supported, digital compas iPod event September 2009 More memory in all, an iPod Classic with 128GB SSD Diversification of the Nano line, more like a smaller iPod Touch Maybe a device more geared to gaming We won&#8217;t see a new type of device until 2010, when the new iPhone will come out, something that goes fit&#8217;s the netbook place, maybe the new iPhone will be that device, maybe it will be something else not sure. Take these with a grain (or a bag) of salt though&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.subite.eu/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/snow-leopard1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-107" title="snow-leopard1" src="http://www.subite.eu/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/snow-leopard1.jpg" alt="snow-leopard1" width="614" height="461" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Just some assumption at what I think we could see in 2009 from Apple Inc.</p>
<p><span id="more-108"></span>Announcing in Januari 2009</p>
<ul>
<li>iMac with Intel i7 CPU, low end with 2 cores (Apple Exclusive), high end with 4 cores</li>
<li>Snow Leopard preview</li>
<li>Mac Mini update, possible different form factor</li>
<li>iLife &#8217;09, basic Blu-ray support</li>
<li>iWork &#8217;09, mostly Number and Pages updates</li>
</ul>
<p>Announcing at DAB 2009</p>
<ul>
<li>30&#8243; LED cinema display</li>
<li>Apple TV update</li>
</ul>
<p>Announcing at WWDC 2009</p>
<ul>
<li>Snow Leopard, just released</li>
<li>iPhone OS push support enabled available 3 weeks after (was announced last year)</li>
<li>iPhone hardware update, better camera, more memory, bluetooth better supported, digital compas</li>
</ul>
<p>iPod event September 2009</p>
<ul>
<li>More memory in all, an iPod Classic with 128GB SSD</li>
<li>Diversification of the Nano line, more like a smaller iPod Touch</li>
<li>Maybe a device more geared to gaming</li>
</ul>
<p>We won&#8217;t see a new type of device until 2010, when the new iPhone will come out, something that goes fit&#8217;s the netbook place, maybe the new iPhone will be that device, maybe it will be something else not sure.</p>
<p>Take these with a grain (or a bag) of salt though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subite.eu/blog/2008/11/19/what-will-apple-bring-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple after sales support rocks</title>
		<link>http://subite.eu/blog/2008/11/10/apple-after-sales-support-rocks/</link>
		<comments>http://subite.eu/blog/2008/11/10/apple-after-sales-support-rocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subite.eu/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, I&#8217;m an Apple fanboy. Those who know me know that fact about me, no doubt. I ordered a new Macbook Pro after the october 14 2008 event. I received it before the 1st of novemeber, but there was something wrong with it. After setting the laptop up the way I want it, and tweaking everything I like it to be, I suddenly discovered that I was missing a screw. Well, the Macbook Pro was missing a screw, one of the four screws visible/accessible at the bottom. I notified Apple and they immediately dispatched a new Macbook Pro and fetched the one with the screw missing. I expected them to solve this, but not in this very effective and satisfying manner. I expected to be sent to a repair shop, or that they will get my laptop, repair it and then send it back. Nope, they just send me a brand new one and recovered the one-screw missing one. I can only recommend people buying Apple products online, the service is excellent. Having dealt with customer support of Dell when a brand new desktop was faulty (a clark drove into the box on the pallet), I can only say this is a refreshment and a way it should be. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-40" title="0810mbp_hero" src="http://www.subite.eu/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/0810mbp_hero.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="269" /></p>
<p>Yup, I&#8217;m an Apple fanboy. Those who know me know that fact about me, no doubt.</p>
<p>I ordered a new Macbook Pro after the october 14 2008 event. I received it before the 1st of novemeber, but there was something wrong with it.</p>
<p><span id="more-39"></span>After setting the laptop up the way I want it, and tweaking everything I like it to be, I suddenly discovered that I was missing a screw. Well, the Macbook Pro was missing a screw, one of the four screws visible/accessible at the bottom.</p>
<p>I notified Apple and they immediately dispatched a new Macbook Pro and fetched the one with the screw missing.</p>
<p>I expected them to solve this, but not in this very effective and satisfying manner. I expected to be sent to a repair shop, or that they will get my laptop, repair it and then send it back. Nope, they just send me a brand new one and recovered the one-screw missing one.</p>
<p>I can only recommend people buying Apple products online, the service is excellent. Having dealt with customer support of Dell when a brand new desktop was faulty (a clark drove into the box on the pallet), I can only say this is a refreshment and a way it should be.</p>
<p>My old Macbook Pro suffered a fall in december 2007, and was dented quite seriously. So much so that it would cost over € 1000 to have it repaired (bottom case, top case and super drive). I decided to sweat it out until something new comes out. In the mean time I discovered that I almost never use the CD drive. So the reasoning for Macbook Air not to have one seems ok. Back in 1999 when Apple ditched the floppy, I think I was using the floppy as much then as I use the CD drive now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://subite.eu/blog/2008/11/10/apple-after-sales-support-rocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

